Creative Commons License

Blog powered by Typepad

« Interview with Beth Noveck as "Peer to Patent" Launches | Main | Wired Publishes Assignment Zero Interviews »

29 June 2007



If the ISO lets in 2 standards then why not 102? The question will go from "Is there and ISO Standard?" to "Which ISO Standard?". If it does then that is the end of ISO.

Jo Walsh

So much criticism is directed at OOXML over this. But do other ISO standards emerge from a series of "product successes and failures, over a period of years"?

ODF, for example, is based on a one-product specification,'s internal XML format. is maintained by Sun at considerable expense, it is not a collectively maintained open source project, Sun and IBM exercise influence over the ODF committee at another pay-to-play industry consortium. Consortia change their rules to encourage Microsoft's membership.

To "punish" MS for its behaviour by seeking to block its standard at ISO is admitting that ISO certification is used as a political tool, a business tool. Is this far from the truth? It is a crisis of compromise in the standards system, rather than the actions of any specific players, which most needs criticism and change.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)